Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

Organization and Basis of Presentation

v3.8.0.1
Organization and Basis of Presentation
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2017
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Organization and Basis of Presentation

Note 1 – Organization and Basis of Presentation

 

Rennova Health, Inc. (“Rennova”), together with its subsidiaries (the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our”), is a vertically integrated provider of healthcare related products and services. The Company’s principal lines of business are (i) clinical laboratory operations; (ii) supportive software solutions to healthcare providers including Electronic Health Records (“EHR”), Medical Billing Services and Laboratory Information Services; and (iii) the recent addition of a rural critical access hospital.

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the 2016 audited financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on April 10, 2017. These condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X of the SEC, and therefore omit or condense certain footnotes and other information normally included in consolidated interim financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of the Company’s management, the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods reported herein. The results of operations presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other interim period or for the entire year.

 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, comprehensive loss was equal to the net loss amounts presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. In addition, certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

 

Reclassification

 

The Company has reclassified certain amounts in the 2016 condensed consolidated financial statements to be consistent with the 2017 presentation. These principally relate to classification of certain revenues, cost of revenues and related segment data, as well as balance sheet classifications to assets and liabilities held for sale. Reclassifications relating to the discontinued operations of AMSG are described further in Note 14. The reclassifications had no impact on operations or cash flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016.

 

Reverse Stock Splits

 

On February 7, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to effect a 1-for-30 reverse stock split of the Company’s shares of common stock effective on February 22, 2017 and on September 21, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to effect a 1-for-15 reverse stock split effective October 5, 2017 (the “Reverse Stock Splits”). The stockholders of the Company had approved these amendments to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation on December 22, 2016 for the February 7, 2017 reverse stock split and on September 20, 2017 for the October 5, 2017 reverse stock split. In both cases, the Company’s stockholders had granted authorization to the Board of Directors to determine in its discretion the specific ratio, subject to limitations, and the timing of the reverse splits within certain specified effective dates.

 

As a result of the Reverse Stock Splits, every 30 shares of the Company’s then outstanding common stock was combined and automatically converted into one share of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, on February 7, 2017 and every 15 shares of the Company’s then outstanding common stock was combined and automatically converted into one share of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, on October 5, 2017. In addition, the conversions and exercise prices of all of the Company’s outstanding preferred stock, common stock purchase warrants, stock options, restricted stock, equity incentive plans and convertible notes payable were proportionately adjusted at the 1:30 reverse split ratio and again at the 1:15 reverse split ratio in accordance with the terms of such instruments. In addition, proportionate voting rights and other rights of common stockholders were not affected by the Reverse Stock Splits, other than as a result of the rounding up of fractional shares in the February reverse split and the payment of cash in lieu of fractional shares in the October reverse split, as no fractional shares were issued in connection with the Reverse Stock Splits.

 

The par value and other terms of the common stock were not affected by the Reverse Stock Splits. The authorized capital of the Company of 500,000,000 shares of common stock and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock were also unaffected by the Reverse Stock Splits.

 

All share, per share and capital stock amounts for all periods presented have been restated to give effect to the Reverse Stock Splits.

 

Adoption of ASU 2017-11

 

In July 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-11 “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260) Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480) Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815).” The amendments in Part I of this Update change the classification analysis of certain equity-linked financial instruments (or embedded features) with down round features. When determining whether certain financial instruments should be classified as liabilities or equity instruments, a down round feature no longer precludes equity classification when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock. The amendments also clarify existing disclosure requirements for equity-classified instruments. As a result, a freestanding equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded conversion option) no longer would be accounted for as a derivative liability at fair value as a result of the existence of a down round feature. For freestanding equity classified financial instruments, the amendments require entities that present earnings per share (EPS) in accordance with Topic 260 to recognize the effect of the down round feature when it is triggered. That effect is treated as a dividend and as a reduction of income available to common shareholders in basic EPS. Convertible instruments with embedded conversion options that have down round features are now subject to the specialized guidance for contingent beneficial conversion features (in Subtopic 470-20, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options), including related EPS guidance (in Topic 260). The amendments in Part II of this Update recharacterize the indefinite deferral of certain provisions of Topic 480 that now are presented as pending content in the Codification, to a scope exception. Those amendments do not have an accounting effect.

 

Under current GAAP, an equity-linked financial instrument with a down round feature that otherwise is not required to be classified as a liability under the guidance in Topic 480 is evaluated under the guidance in Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, to determine whether it meets the definition of a derivative. If it meets that definition, the instrument (or embedded feature) is evaluated to determine whether it is indexed to an entity’s own stock as part of the analysis of whether it qualifies for a scope exception from derivative accounting. Generally, for warrants and conversion options embedded in financial instruments that are deemed to have a debt host (assuming the underlying shares are readily convertible to cash or the contract provides for net settlement such that the embedded conversion option meets the definition of a derivative), the existence of a down round feature results in an instrument not being considered indexed to an entity’s own stock. This results in a reporting entity being required to classify the freestanding financial instrument or the bifurcated conversion option as a liability, which the entity must measure at fair value initially and at each subsequent reporting date.

 

The amendments in this Update revise the guidance for instruments with down round features in Subtopic 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity, which is considered in determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument qualifies for a scope exception from derivative accounting. An entity still is required to determine whether instruments would be classified in equity under the guidance in Subtopic 815-40 in determining whether they qualify for that scope exception. If they do qualify, freestanding instruments with down round features are no longer classified as liabilities and embedded conversion options with down round features are no longer bifurcated.

 

For entities that present EPS in accordance with Topic 260, and when the down round feature is included in an equity-classified freestanding financial instrument, the value of the effect of the down round feature is treated as a dividend when it is triggered and as a numerator adjustment in the basic EPS calculation. This reflects the occurrence of an economic transfer of value to the holder of the instrument, while alleviating the complexity and income statement volatility associated with fair value measurement on an ongoing basis. Convertible instruments are unaffected by the Topic 260 amendments in this Update.

 

Those amendments in Part 1 of this Update are a cost savings relative to current GAAP. This is because, assuming the required criteria for equity classification in Subtopic 815-40 are met, an entity that issued such an instrument no longer measures the instrument at fair value at each reporting period (in the case of warrants) or separately accounts for a bifurcated derivative (in the case of convertible instruments) on the basis of the existence of a down round feature. For convertible instruments with embedded conversion options that have down round features, applying specialized guidance such as the model for contingent beneficial conversion features rather than bifurcating an embedded derivative also reduces cost and complexity. Under that specialized guidance, the issuer recognizes the intrinsic value of the feature only when the feature becomes beneficial instead of bifurcating the conversion option and measuring it at fair value each reporting period.

 

The amendments in Part II of this Update replace the indefinite deferral of certain guidance in Topic 480 with a scope exception. This has the benefit of improving the readability of the Codification and reducing the complexity associated with navigating the guidance in Topic 480.

 

For public business entities, the amendments in Part I of this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. For all other entities, the amendments in Part I of this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted for all entities, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. The amendments in Part 1 of this Update should be applied in either of the following ways: 1. Retrospectively to outstanding financial instruments with a down round feature by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the statement of financial position as of the beginning of the first fiscal year and interim period(s) in which the pending content that links to this paragraph is effective; or 2. Retrospectively to outstanding financial instruments with a down round feature for each prior reporting period presented in accordance with the guidance on accounting changes in paragraphs 250-10-45-5 through 45-10.

 

The amendments in Part II of this Update do not require any transition guidance because those amendments do not have an accounting effect.

 

The Company has determined that this amendment had a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements and has early adopted this accounting standard update. The cumulative effect of the adoption of ASU 2017-11 resulted in the reclassification of the derivative liability recorded of $56 million and the reversal of $41 million of interest expense recorded in the Company’s first fiscal quarter of 2017. The remaining $16 million was offset to additional paid in capital (discount on convertible debenture). Additionally, the Company recognized a deemed dividend from the trigger of the down round provision feature of $53.3 million. A $51 million deemed dividend was recorded retrospectively as of the beginning of the issuance of the March 2017 debentures where the initial derivative liability was recorded. A $2.3 million deemed dividend adjustment was recorded in the three months ended September 30, 2017 as a result of the down round provision feature.

 

Going Concern

 

The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared using U.S. GAAP applicable to a going concern that contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has accumulated significant losses and has negative cash flows from operations, and at September 30, 2017 had a working capital deficit and stockholders’ deficit of $18.0 million and $18.8 million, respectively, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. In addition, the Company’s cash position as of the date of this report is critically deficient, critical payments are not being made in the ordinary course of business and certain indebtedness in the amount of $6.0 million matured on March 31, 2017, which the Company does not have the financial resources to satisfy (see Note 5), all of which raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

 

The Company continues to consider efficiencies and is currently using one laboratory for the majority of its toxicology diagnostics thereby reducing the number of employees and associated operating expenses, in order to reduce costs. In addition, the Company received approximately $15.7 million in cash from the issuances of debentures and warrants in the first nine months of 2017 (see Note 6), $3.8 million from related parties and an additional $4.0 million of proceeds on October 30, 2017 from the issuance of convertible preferred stock (see Note 15). In July 2017, the Company announced that it plans to spin off its Advanced Molecular Services Group (“AMSG”) as an independent publicly traded company by way of a tax-free distribution to its shareholders. Completion of the spinoff of AMSG is expected to occur during the first quarter of 2018, and is subject to numerous conditions, including effectiveness of a Registration Statement on Form 10 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and consents, including under various funding agreements previously entered into by the Company. The intent of the spinoff of AMSG is to create two public companies, each of which can focus on its own strengths and operational plans. In accordance with ASC 205-20 and having met the criteria for “held for sale”, the Company has reflected amounts relating to AMSG as a disposal group classified as held for sale and included as part of discontinued operations. AMSG is no longer included in the segment reporting following the reclassification to discontinued operations. The discontinued operations of AMSG are described further in Note 14. The Company also announced that the Big South Fork Medical Center received CMS regional office licensure approval and opened its doors on August 8, 2017. The hospital provided services to over 1,854 patients and recognized approximately $0.6 million of revenues during the three months ended September 30, 2017. The Company may amend its current revenue recognition policy and percentage for the hospital when payments are received to support amended revenue recognition methodologies. Therefore, the Company expects that the opening of the hospital will continue to provide additional revenue and cash flow sources.

 

There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to achieve its business plan, raise any additional capital or secure the additional financing necessary to implement its current operating plan. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to significantly reduce its operating costs, increase its revenues and eventually regain profitable operations. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

 

Recent Events

 

Common Stock Listing

 

Effective October 25, 2017, the Company’s common stock (RNVA) and warrants to purchase common stock (RNVAW) were no longer listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market but began trading on the OTCQB instead, as more fully discussed in Note 15.

 

Financing Agreements

 

On October 30, 2017, the Company issued its Series I-1 Convertible Preferred Stock, and modified the anti-dilution provisions of certain outstanding debentures and warrants that were issued in March 2017, as more fully discussed in Note 15.